|
A GOOD HOME IN THE COUNTRY
by Mary Flitner
When I was a little kid we had a dog that was a real nuisance.
He chased livestock, tore stuff up, and bit people. One day that
dog mysteriously disappeared, and when I asked my dad what had
become of it, he said seriously “Well, it went to a good home in
the country.” Years later I learned that the dog had been laid
to rest in the back-forty of our ranch and since then I’ve known
that a good home in the country might mean something different
to each of us.
Here in Wyoming, it equates with rural sprawl and those dream
houses outside of town. We struggle with desire for growth, fear
of change, respect of private property rights, hope for order,
and distaste for excessive governing. Living in the country
isn’t as simple as it seems.
There’s a Native American viewpoint which suggests that we
should weigh our impact on a place seven generations into the
future, with reverence for our surroundings. The “new” place
must be entered with humility and respect for what has gone
before and what is to come. Unfortunately that doesn’t hold true
in many of the 40-acre ranchettes and remote subdivisions which
require roads, utilities and community services.
How the countryside looks is only part of the equation.
Long-range impacts created by a dwelling, a business or a
development project aren’t always immediately visible. Ugly,
shabby shack-towns are annoying, but in the long run may not be
permanently harmful – they are only eyesores which can
eventually be removed with a D-8 Caterpillar or a box of
matches, leaving the area to a fairly natural state. Other
times, an owner takes pride in his progress and works slowly to
improve the setting as his time and money allows.
In contrast, an expensive asphalt-rock-log “next to Forest”
business development or residence may add value to a community,
and often a wealthy newcomer brings energy, stimulation and new
ideas to the local area. If the business fails, however, or the
owner tires of the West, the problem remains: an empty,
hard-to-sell monument, a big blemish on the skyline. In Wyoming
and Rocky Mountain states, of course, the foothills, meadows and
river valleys which are the most desirable for “ranchettes” were
previously the winter refuge for wildlife or domestic livestock.
Buildings which perch on bluffs and rimrocks bring their own set
of problems for wildlife corridors, erosion, utility providers,
local services and road maintenance even though the view is
spectacular.
In the olden days, country homes were located within the
workplace, usually a farm or ranch. A home in the country was
practical – placed for shelter and convenience – next to the
road, snuggled out of the weather. Close enough to the barn or
corral to make things easy in bad weather. Close enough to the
main road so that the kids could get to school, so that people
could get to the doctor or the grocery store. There were no
plate-glass windows and not much regard for the panoramic view.
Nowadays, who can be blamed for wanting a home in the country -
a beautiful view, room for the kids to play and maybe a place to
keep a dog and a horse? Sadly, these homes in the country are
often just a place to sleep, where the local road warrior rests
between trips to his job in town, travel to meetings and the
kids’ school activities. Or perhaps the home is a vacation spot
for a retiree who commutes from his real home in another state.
Either way, many traveling homeowners haven’t got much time to
appreciate the setting, much less contribute to it.
As I see it, good homes in the country belong to people who have
stepped up to an understanding of an area: local culture and
needs, rural traditions, histories, agricultural values,
wildlife habitat, visual harmony. They learn about schools,
taxes, fences, ditches and water rights. Because they understand
the obligation to give back to the resource and the community,
these people commit their hearts and minds to the place they’ve
entered.
Our growing rural communities aren’t measured by wealth or
appearance. At the end of the conversations, I wish there were a
way to plan and zone according to what is in people’s hearts and
minds instead of what is on the outside of their buildings.
That’s my dream for a “good home in the country”.
Previously printed in
The Wyoming Livestock Roundup |